Guest Columnist
CBS Sunday Morning stories this week included: Dazzling Jewelry of Van Cleef and Arpels, Extreme Golf Carts, Designing Intimate Lingerie, Sydney Opera House, and Doghouse Designs Rivaling Master’s Domain.
In every case viewers were treated to how the elite, well-to-do upper class around the world thrive in luxury. Frankly, the stories evoked liberal/progressive emotions. I wanted to take away all the money those featured in the stories were wasting on trivial pursuits and give it to those in need.
America is fortunate to have a middle class. Few nations in the world do. Most nations have two classes: a rich, elite ruling class, and everybody else who are poor. I know of no one in America’s middle class who could afford to purchase jewelry from Van Cleef and Arpels, much less purchasing a single piece of lingerie costing more than $200. Why would someone in the middle class purchase these when knockoffs are so readily available? Who would know the difference?
The one exception is that middle class folks could easily design and build doghouses or pet abodes rivaling or even superseding their own domiciles. I’ve seen that in my own home!
How do the wealthy in America compare with the wealthy in other parts of the world? For that matter, how do those in need in America compare with needy people in any other nation of the world? Answers to these questions add context to debates raging today between those on the left and the right.
Those on the left advocate redistributing opulent wealth to those less fortunate. Anyone with a heart desiring to help those in need could easily justify taking dollars from the filthy rich and redistributing aid to the least fortunate among us.
Those on the right advocate creating and maintaining an environment where everyone has equal access to opportunities to succeed. A few of us will always need help, but the vast majority of us will prosper on our own given a good work ethic and open-ended opportunities to succeed.
Before the federal government grew big enough to help anyone and everyone, communities, friends and families all pitched in to help those in need. We all worked together for the common good at the local level.
As our nation has prospered far beyond any other nation in the history of our planet, we’ve allowed the federal government to assume powers in practically every venue of our lives. Washington has assumed the role of universal helper-in-chief for all that ails citizens and aliens alike.
Thomas Jefferson said, “Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”
Jefferson also said, “A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned – this is the sum of good government.”
We need a wiser and more frugal government today.
Daniel L. Gardner is a syndicated columnist who lives in Starkville, MS. You may contact him at Daniel@DanLGardner.com, or visit his website at http://www.danlgardner.com Feel free to interact with him on the Clarion-Ledger feature blog site http://www.clarionledger.com/section/blogs06. Gardner’s columns are also featured on http://dannygardner.opinioneditorial.com
His column does not reflect the views of Starkville-Now.







Recent comments